[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:10:36 +0200
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060607161610.GC29821@afilias.info>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Subject: [ietf-provreg] Re: a new core command...?

On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 12:16:10PM -0400,
 Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info> wrote 
 a message of 34 lines which said:

> I think everyone has assumed, historically, that the sponsor of a
> repository object in EPP would also keep their own data about their
> sponsored objects.  They ought to know about those object already,
> no?  In any case, since all the commands are per-object in EPP, I'm
> having a hard time understanding the motivation for a bulk query.
> I'm likely just dim, though (other people have also observed that
> about me!), so if you have a use case in mind, I'd be interested to
> hear it.

I can mention a real use-case that we had recently: a registrar of
".fr" simply wanted to check that the two databases agreed, so they
sent whois requests for every domain they manage. And asked us if
something was missing from their list.

They told us that it was part of a new quality policy, SOX, corporate
governance and so on.

Home | Date list | Subject list