To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Eugenio Pinto <eugenio.pinto@fccn.pt>
Date:
Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:52:33 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<4485991A.9080704@fccn.pt>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] a new core command...?
>Eugenio Pinto wrote: >As a Provisioning Protocol I'm wondering if it shouldn't be there >another query command besides <check>, <info> and <transfer> that would >allow us to retrieve all the objects actually provisioned by a repository. > >Andrew Sullivan wrote: >I believe the iris-dreg2 CRISP approach provides what you want. This >seems to be a matter of querying, rather than of provisioning. You can >find that at http://tools.ietf.org/wg/crisp/draft-ietf-crisp-iris-dreg2 Hi all, I've already checked this out and I have some doubts I would like you to answer. If IRIS is specifically designed for querying and if a bulk query would be a real problem for big Registries (like COM/NET) are big Registries implementing IRIS on server side? Is anyone providing EPP and IRIS implementations to your Registrars/Resellers? I've seen some interesting implementation extensions to EPP and some aspects of IRIS fits better in the whole variety of Registries then EPP definitions. Wouldn't it be better to provide a provisioning and querying protocol all-in-one to our Registrars, instead of two different API's with different schemas?... I think so. If you don't, please explain me why. Best Regards, Eugenio Pinto FCCN - DNS.PT