[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Cc: Ietf-Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 07:57:50 -0800
In-Reply-To: <v0313030eb684e028a5fc@[10.33.10.145]>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Why Interim Meetings?

At 06:04 PM 1/12/2001 -0500, Edward Lewis wrote:
>I believe that this is the consensus on the meetings so far:

What is the final plan?  If there is to be an interim meeting, people need 
to know the logistics.

If the meeting is for Design Team work, then it is closed.  That is, it is 
by invitation only.  That is the nature of design teams.

If the meeting is a full working group meeting, then there needs to be 
significant advance notice and an agenda, so people can determine what work 
will be done at the meeting.

d/


Home | Date list | Subject list