[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
cc: Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>, Ietf-Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@sidn.nl>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:14:15 +0100
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 18 Jan 2001 07:57:50 -0800. <5.1.0.4.2.20010118075550.06550730@brandenburg.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Why Interim Meetings?


    
    If the meeting is for Design Team work, then it is closed.
    That is, it is by invitation only.  That is the nature of design
    teams.

    If the meeting is a full working group meeting, then there
    needs to be significant advance notice and an agenda, so people
    can determine what work will be done at the meeting.

My preference is that if there will be an interim meeting, it should
be an open meeting. I hear too often from existing TLD registries
that they feel locked out in this.

	jaap

Home | Date list | Subject list