To:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Cc:
Ietf-Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, lewis@tislabs.com
From:
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@dcrocker.net>
Date:
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 23:20:17 -0800
In-Reply-To:
<v0313030eb684e028a5fc@[10.33.10.145]>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Why Interim Meetings?
At 06:04 PM 1/12/2001 -0500, Edward Lewis wrote: >Do we have volunteers to host the European and Asia/Pacific meetings? Having one interim IETF working group meeting is a big deal. Having multiple, at around the same time, is probably unprecedented. The fact that IETF working groups are inclusive forces the assumption that everyone can legitimately consider coming to an interim meeting. Planning multiple meetings, for the same time, according to geography, runs counter to that. My comments about Asia were based on noting that a number of people said they would already be in the area. Hence the suggestion was to have the meeting near a already-planned event, rather than separately. >I would also like to request that as part of these meetings, reports of the >discussions be made available to the mailing list. Because of the As an official activity of the IETF, meeting notes are required to be submitted to the Secretariat. d/ =-=-=-=-= Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com> Brandenburg Consulting <www.brandenburg.com> Tel: +1.408.246.8253, Fax: +1.408.273.6464