[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Cc: lewis@tislabs.com
From: Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 16:32:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <200101130748.IAA19391@balsa.cetp.ipsl.fr>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Why Interim Meetings?

At/À 08:48 2001-01-13 +0100, Elisabeth Porteneuve you wrote/vous écriviez:

>For your information here is the known schedule for ccTLD meetings
>in January-February:
>
>       22 Jan: CENTR Technical Workshop in Amsterdam (attached to RIPE)
>    23-26 Jan: RIPE 38, Amsterdam,
>    30-31 Jan: MINC Workshop in Honolulu, Hawaii
>        1 Feb: ccTLD-ICANN meeting in Asia-Pac (see 19 Feb), Honolulu, Hawaii
>     2- 3 Feb: Study Session on ICANN in Zurich (some ccTLD involved)
>        5 Feb: CENTR Legal meeting (attached to Zurich)
>       19 Feb: ccTLD-ICANN meeting in Europe (see 1 Feb), Geneva, Switzerland
>       20 Feb: ccTLD-WIPO meeting in Geneva, Switzerland
>       21 Feb: meeting place reserved in Geneva, if ccTLD wants discuss more
>    22-23 Feb: CENTR GA meeting in Guernsay, British Channel Islands
>               (important meetings, ExCom re-election)
>March:
>        9 Mar: ccTLD meeting prior to ICANN Melbourne, in Melbourne, Australia
>    10-13 Mar: ICANN Melbourne
>    18-23 Mar: IETF Minnessota, USA
>
>Looks overloaded ...

- not necessarily the exact same set of people.
- maybe just-before-ietf can be something reasonable.

Regards, Marc.


>Elisabeth Porteneuve
>--
>
> > From owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se Sat Jan 13 00:12 MET 2001
> > X-Sender: lewis@pop.gw.tislabs.com
> > Message-Id: <v0313030eb684e028a5fc@[10.33.10.145]>
> > Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:04:42 -0500
> > To: Ietf-Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
> > From: Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
> > Subject: Why Interim Meetings?
> > Cc: lewis@tislabs.com
> >
> > I believe that this is the consensus on the meetings so far:
> >
> > 1) The requirements will largely be settled by then, so a requirements
> > discussion would NOT be on the agenda.
> >
> > 2) The discussion of the implementation of the protocol, starting from the
> > EPP proposal, is to be the primary item on the agenda.  Essentially, a
> > design meeting.
> >
> > 3) The desire is to get broad input.  A meeting is to be held in Washington
> > DC between Feb 19 and 22.  Meetings have been discussed in Europe for the
> > ccTLDs and in Asia/Pacific, possibly representing the ICANN gTLDs.
> >
> > 4) The meetings should be scheduled between Feburary and the March IETF.
> >
> > Do we have volunteers to host the European and Asia/Pacific meetings?
> >
> > I would also like to request that as part of these meetings, reports of the
> > discussions be made available to the mailing list.  Because of the
> > geographic extent of the meetings, many of the interested parties will not
> > be able to attend all of them.
> >
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > Edward Lewis                                                NAI Labs
> > Phone: +1 443-259-2352                      Email: lewis@tislabs.com
> >
> > Dilbert is an optimist.
> >
> > Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.
> >
> >
> >


Marc Blanchet
Viagénie inc.
tel: 418-656-9254
http://www.viagenie.qc.ca

----------------------------------------------------------
Normos (http://www.normos.org): Internet standards portal:
IETF RFC, drafts, IANA, W3C, ATMForum, ISO, ... all in one place.


Home | Date list | Subject list