To:
George Belotsky <george@register.com>, Paul George <pgeorge@saraf.com>
Cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se, ietf-whois@imc.org
From:
Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Date:
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 19:25:11 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<20010124123722.L24903@register.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Merging RRP and Whois
At 12.37 -0500 01-01-24, George Belotsky wrote:
>It would not take too much effort to simply use the Whois-like
>features (perhaps with a little extension) of the RRP to provide Whois
>services to end users.
I think this is a VERY interesting path that you should consider
seriously! Including anonymous access, and ability for registrants
(yes, registrants) to because of data protection laws update whatever
is necessary in the registry database in the case of a thick
registry. Also, this connection might be needed also for DNSSEC key
signing issues...
I.e. if you do a protocol, and need overlapping functions, see if you
should not do _one_...
What goes on port 43 is a completely different story, and it should
stay that way.
paf -- with my AD hat on as you can see in the signature
--
Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com> Internet Engineering Task Force
Area Director, Applications Area http://www.ietf.org
Phone: (Stockholm) +46-8-4494212 (San Jose) +1-408-525-0940
PGP: 2DFC AAF6 16F0 F276 7843 2DC1 BC79 51D9 7D25 B8DC