To:
Rob Austein <sra+dnsop@hactrn.net>
CC:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date:
Fri, 07 Nov 2003 09:35:52 +0900
In-Reply-To:
<20031106222233.83FE818E4@thrintun.hactrn.net>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Subject:
Re: Sense of the WG on DNS discovery
Rob Austein; >>>Your friendly neighborhood WG chairs have been watching the ongoing >>>discussion and trying to see whether we determine the will of the >>>working group in this matter. >> >>Watching? I think you have been actively acting for DHCPv6-Lite. > Nolo contendre, but the two are not mutually exclusive, since the > question was about what the WG believes, not about what I believe. Which WG are you talking about? >>Can you agree that your attack on well known address approach >>on failure mode is unfounded and applicable to all the >>approaches? > > > I still think there's a difference in the default query propegation > behavior for a badly configured network, if that's what you're asking. Queries propagate to the configured IP addresses, regardless of how the addresses are configured. Masataka Ohta #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.