[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>
CC: Rob Austein <sra+dnsop@hactrn.net>, dnsop@cafax.se
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 09:32:37 +0900
In-Reply-To: <20031106230957.GA18304@1-4-5.net>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Subject: Re: Sense of the WG on DNS discovery

David Meyer;

>>>>Your friendly neighborhood WG chairs have been watching the ongoing
>>>>discussion and trying to see whether we determine the will of the
>>>>working group in this matter.
>>>
>>>Watching? I think you have been actively acting for DHCPv6-Lite.
> 
> 
> 	I would phrase it somewhat differently.  And what I can
> 	say on this topic is that in Vienna, I asked the
> 	DHCPv6-lite question in a several different forms,
> 	including:

As a co-chair of our friendly neighborhood WG, you MUST be
aware that the ML is the WG.

> 	(i).	In what way is DHCPv6-lite insufficient?

Too complex and heavy weighted than a simple alternative, which
was abandoned with wrong reasons long before and resurrected
after the meeting.

> 	(ii).	Why not DHCPv6-lite?

See above.

> 	Neither was ever really answered, either during our
> 	meeting or subsequently.

I haven't asked the question.

						Masataka Ohta


#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.

Home | Date list | Subject list