To:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Rob Austein <sra+dnsop@hactrn.net>
Date:
Thu, 06 Nov 2003 17:22:33 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<3FAAC12B.2070500@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Wanderlust/2.10.0 (Venus) Emacs/20.7 Mule/4.0 (HANANOEN)
Subject:
Re: Sense of the WG on DNS discovery
At Fri, 07 Nov 2003 06:46:19 +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote: > > > Your friendly neighborhood WG chairs have been watching the ongoing > > discussion and trying to see whether we determine the will of the > > working group in this matter. > > Watching? I think you have been actively acting for DHCPv6-Lite. Nolo contendre, but the two are not mutually exclusive, since the question was about what the WG believes, not about what I believe. > Can you agree that your attack on well known address approach > on failure mode is unfounded and applicable to all the > approaches? I still think there's a difference in the default query propegation behavior for a badly configured network, if that's what you're asking. Whether that's relevant to anything the WG cares about is for the WG to decide. > As I saw no response from you to my counter arguement, I thought > you are convinced that well know address approach is good enough. I had nothing new to say on the subject. #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.