[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "'Hollenbeck, Scott'" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: "Lynette Khirallah" <lynettek@netnumber.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 13:58:01 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD60189B79D@vsvapostal3.bkup6>
Reply-To: <lynettek@netnumber.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: Some More Off-List Comments

is there already a <msg> element in the <result> that is being used for
human-readable error condition explanations? I just checked the latest
contact draft and there is a <msg> element in the <result>. How is this
<reason> element any different from <msg>?
If you do add another text element, can it be optional?

thanks,
Lynette

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se]On
> Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:26 AM
> To: 'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'
> Subject: Some More Off-List Comments
>
>
> I've received a few more comments for protocol
> fixes/improvements off-list.
> I intend to send these to the IESG when they open the last call:
>
> - Increase the length of the contact postal code field to 16
> characters
> because postal codes longer than 10 characters (the current limit) are
> possible in some countries, such as Mexico and France.  Perhaps list
> participants living or working in those countries can confirm?
>
> - Add a child "reason" text element to the <result> element
> so that error
> conditions can be explained more fully in a server-defined,
> human-readable
> way.
>
> -Scott-


Home | Date list | Subject list