To:
"'Hollenbeck, Scott'" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Lynette Khirallah" <lynettek@netnumber.com>
Date:
Thu, 7 Mar 2002 13:58:01 -0500
Importance:
Normal
In-Reply-To:
<3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD60189B79D@vsvapostal3.bkup6>
Reply-To:
<lynettek@netnumber.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Some More Off-List Comments
is there already a <msg> element in the <result> that is being used for human-readable error condition explanations? I just checked the latest contact draft and there is a <msg> element in the <result>. How is this <reason> element any different from <msg>? If you do add another text element, can it be optional? thanks, Lynette > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se > [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se]On > Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:26 AM > To: 'ietf-provreg@cafax.se' > Subject: Some More Off-List Comments > > > I've received a few more comments for protocol > fixes/improvements off-list. > I intend to send these to the IESG when they open the last call: > > - Increase the length of the contact postal code field to 16 > characters > because postal codes longer than 10 characters (the current limit) are > possible in some countries, such as Mexico and France. Perhaps list > participants living or working in those countries can confirm? > > - Add a child "reason" text element to the <result> element > so that error > conditions can be explained more fully in a server-defined, > human-readable > way. > > -Scott-