To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Cc:
lewis@tislabs.com
From:
asbjorn.rrp@theglobalname.org
Date:
24 Aug 2001 12:05:31 -0000
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Push vs. not Push
Hi, representing The Global Name Registry (.NAME Registry Operator), we agree with Hollenbeck's view that only <poll> should be a MUST. Asbjorn Steira Global Name Registry Ltd. On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:56:29 -0400 Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com> wrote: >After going through the email and minutes, I think that there is a need to >poll the list to see if folks want the "push" mechanism to be defined or >not. As far as the merits of such a mechanism, please refrain from >commenting on that, as it appears in archived messages. My sense is that >we aren't arguing the merits of push, but rather, whether implementors >would be willing to add this feature in response to user (registr*) needs. -- The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender by replying and delete this email so that it is not recoverable. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any retention, review, disclosure, distribution, copying, printing, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information is strictly prohibited and without liability on our part.