[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: shollenbeck@verisign.com (Hollenbeck, Scott)
Cc: Olivier.Guillard@nic.fr ('Olivier Guillard'), ietf-provreg@cafax.se (Ietf-Provreg)
From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 08:43:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D75046B@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com> from "Hollenbeck, Scott" at Jan 10, 2001 12:21:53 PM
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Security vs. Authorization

% > Are you sure that the registrar is the only one entitle do 
% > performe any
% > change?
% 
% There should be only one registrar authorized to change an object, but they
% should do so either on behalf of a registrant or pursuant to whatever legal
% arrangement exists between registrar and registrant.
% 
% <Scott/>

	I think that this might be problematic.  There should be a 
	method to allow "override" in the event the single authorized
	registrar is unwilling/unable to make the change.


--bill

Home | Date list | Subject list