To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc:
"'Olivier Guillard'" <Olivier.Guillard@nic.fr>, Ietf-Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Olivier Guillard <Olivier.Guillard@nic.fr>
Date:
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 18:35:29 +0100
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D75046B@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com>; from shollenbeck@verisign.com on Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 12:21:53PM -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.2.5i
Subject:
Re: Security vs. Authorization
> > Are you sure that the registrar is the only one entitle do > > performe any > > change? > > There should be only one registrar authorized to change an object... I don't think this is an issue for a technical protocol. It sounds like more of a business or political issue. > ... but they > should do so either on behalf of a registrant or pursuant to whatever legal > arrangement exists between registrar and registrant. Regards, -- Olivier