To:
Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
CC:
Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM>, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date:
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 05:37:12 +0900
In-Reply-To:
<3A5A0748-1542-11D8-A1D0-000A95CD987A@muada.com>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Subject:
Re: DNS discovery
Iljitsch; > Reading RFC 2462 will clear that confusion right up. There is an > explicit bit in router advertisements that tells hosts whether they > should use a stateful mechanism (sorry, this is what it's called, > replace with "DHCPv6lite" in the next version) to discover additional > configuration information. That is the source of all the confusions caused by a poorly defined word of "stateless". That is, DHCP-lite is considered to be a "stateless" mechanism. I agreee DHCP is the way to go with the, so called, "stateful" cases. Masataka Ohta #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.