[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro <yasuhiro@nttv6.jp>
CC: dmm@1-4-5.net, dnsop@cafax.se
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:20:21 +0900
In-Reply-To: <20031107.112945.74748564.yasuhiro@nttv6.jp>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Subject: Re: Sense of the WG on DNS discovery

SHIRASAKI san;

>>1. a "stateless" subset of the current DHCPv6, as specified in
>>   draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateless-01.txt
>>2. an extension to the current DHCPv6 that has the ability to
>>   multicast the stateless information (that I guess Alain first
>>   proposed)
> 
> 
>>	(i).	In what way is DHCPv6-lite insufficient?
> 
> 
> DHCPv6-lite has no way to inform a DNS recursing server renumbering.

That is a good reason to use well known addresses not affected by
renumbering.

						Masataka Ohta


#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.

Home | Date list | Subject list