To:
Rob Austein <sra+dnsop@hactrn.net>
Cc:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L@C#:H(B
<jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
Date:
Fri, 07 Nov 2003 04:03:43 +0900
In-Reply-To:
<20031106175134.6CB0118F8@thrintun.hactrn.net>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Subject:
Re: Sense of the WG on DNS discovery
>>>>> On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:51:34 -0500, >>>>> Rob Austein <sra+dnsop@hactrn.net> said: > The question to the WG here is not "Do you agree that DHCPv6-Lite is > the best choice?" (we know that some would disagree with that), but > rather "Do you agree that this is the sense of the WG?" A quick check: what exactly do you mean by "DHCPv6-Lite"? 1. a "stateless" subset of the current DHCPv6, as specified in draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateless-01.txt 2. an extension to the current DHCPv6 that has the ability to multicast the stateless information (that I guess Alain first proposed) 3. others JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.