[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Kenneth Porter <shiva@sewingwitch.com>
Cc: dnsop@cafax.se
From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 04:09:06 +0100
In-Reply-To: <38327071.1048008700@[10.0.0.4]>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: "local" zones

At 5:31 PM -0800 2003/03/18, Kenneth Porter wrote:

>  That's an interesting idea. How might this be automated? While BIND
>  supports dynamic updates within a zone, it doesn't support dynamic
>  creation and destruction of entire zones. One would have to restart
>  a server with a new named.conf when a new bogon list was issued.

	The bind-dlz project has proven that this is not true.  With the 
current version of BIND, you would need no more than a reload.  If we 
can update the DNSUPDATE protocol to include the creation of entirely 
new zones, we can avoid this problem, too.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.

Home | Date list | Subject list