[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: ahu@ds9a.nl (bert hubert)
Cc: kre@munnari.OZ.AU (Robert Elz), bmanning@ISI.EDU (Bill Manning), ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dnsop@cafax.se
From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20010815172026.K28995@fork.powerdns.com> from "bert hubert" at Aug 15, 2001 05:20:26 PM
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary

% 
% On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:56:37PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
% >     Date:        Wed, 15 Aug 2001 06:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
% >     From:        Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
% >     Message-ID:  <200108151300.f7FD0YH05643@zed.isi.edu>
% > 
% >   | 	Then the Internet is doomed.  Either evolution or revolution.
% > 
% > In some places, revolution is all that is possible.   The evolutionary
% > step is just too big to every take.
% 
% I'm butting in here, but it may be interesting to know that quite a number
% of the top-100 resolving nameserver installations out there are still
% running Bind4! I'm doing some research on the big resolvers out there,
% especially the (non-)randomness of the id field.
% 
% Some of these people have gone through great lengths to remain at Bind4,
% even though they run late breaking operating system releases.
% 
% Regards,
% 
% bert hubert

	I'd like to compare numbers. 

-- 
--bill

Home | Date list | Subject list