To:
Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
Cc:
Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
Date:
Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:20:26 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<3255.997887397@brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU>; from kre@munnari.OZ.AU on Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:56:37PM +0700
Mail-Followup-To:
bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>, Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>,Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com,ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dnsop@cafax.se
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.2.5i
Subject:
Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:56:37PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 06:00:34 -0700 (PDT) > From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU> > Message-ID: <200108151300.f7FD0YH05643@zed.isi.edu> > > | Then the Internet is doomed. Either evolution or revolution. > > In some places, revolution is all that is possible. The evolutionary > step is just too big to every take. I'm butting in here, but it may be interesting to know that quite a number of the top-100 resolving nameserver installations out there are still running Bind4! I'm doing some research on the big resolvers out there, especially the (non-)randomness of the id field. Some of these people have gone through great lengths to remain at Bind4, even though they run late breaking operating system releases. Regards, bert hubert