To:
kre@munnari.OZ.AU (Robert Elz)
Cc:
bmanning@ISI.EDU (Bill Manning), ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
Date:
Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
<3255.997887397@brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU> from "Robert Elz" at Aug 15, 2001 09:56:37 PM
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary
% a big enough fraction of sites to make it actually useful), sticking % idn labels directly in the DNS (and having the app protocols deal with % that), and using A6 rather than AAAA. % % The last we can choose to do now, it is still possible. The others we % could choose to do, but I doubt they'd ever actually work (idn just % maybe, with enough pressure - as comparatively little actually cares, % whatever the standards say). % % | Or am I reading too much into your statements? % % Perhaps. % % kre Ah... the light (well a light) is illuminated. We are in agreement save on two points: - the viablity of transition - the timeframe of transition Transition viability is debatable, the key point seems to be the window in which the transition occurs. You are arguing for a fairly short schedule and I think this can be streched out some -- --bill