To:
"'EPP Provreg'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
Date:
Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:45:09 -0400
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<4C230989.4020707@publisher.de>
Mail-Followup-To:
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>,'EPP Provreg' <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] Presentation on EPP present and future
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:30:17AM +0200, Ulrich Wisser wrote: > The nice thing about all the extensions in the wild is, that we are now > seeing real world business needs for EPP. We could try to filter out a > common set of extensions needs and create one or more new standard > extensions. One way to tackle this would be for someone to put together draft-epp-common-profile that would outline the extensions (including -- or not -- the base domain, host, contact extensions) that support the widest interoperation. That is not actually a change to the protocol as such, though it is of course an overall change to the operating protocol as deployed. I think it would be very helpful to have a draft that one could discuss, however. But since I work for neither a registry nor a (real) registrar, I'm not offering to write it. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@shinkuro.com Shinkuro, Inc. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se