[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "'Patrick Mevzek'" <provreg@contact.dotandco.com>, "'EPP Provreg'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: "Michael Young" <myoung@ca.afilias.info>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 01:20:46 +0200
Content-Language: en-ca
In-Reply-To: <20100623190057.GM23071@home.patoche.org>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Thread-Index: AcsTH/VECbD7PToOTxqbiFuqi7C4OgACTEYw
Subject: RE: [ietf-provreg] Presentation on EPP present and future

As far as I understand the process to initiate further EPP work in the IETF
would focus on a) defining a problem and subsequent scope of work  b)
garnering support from the relevant area director  c) following the process
of initiating a working group - mailing list where clear efforts are
demonstrated, BOF, etc OR another option is to file an informational RFC.

Its been said before, but I'll say it again, EPP is an Extensible protocol.
Given its flexibility, I have yet to hear an argument as to why existing
issues cannot be addressed using the extension system.

If a valid argument can be made, I am happy to support additional efforts on
the base protocol, as of yet, I have not seen one.

Best Regards,

Michael Young


-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Mevzek [mailto:provreg@contact.dotandco.com] 
Sent: June-23-10 9:01 PM
To: EPP Provreg
Subject: [ietf-provreg] Presentation on EPP present and future

Hello,

I've done last monday in the ICANN ccNSO
tech day a presentation on my current view of EPP, based on the
extensions seen in the wild, and what could be future works on EPP
with some data on the 60+ extensions I've seen, and choices among EPP
"options" (host as attribute or contact, contact data, etc.)

You can find the presentation online here:
http://www.dotandco.com/services/software/Net-DRI/docs/netdri-future-epp-ica
nn-brussels-ccnso-techday-201006/index.html
or if you want just the text as PDF:
http://www.dotandco.com/services/software/Net-DRI/docs/netdri-future-epp-ica
nn-brussels-ccnso-techday-201006/netdri-future-epp-icann-brussels-ccnso-tech
day-201006.pdf

While the attendance was high, there has not been any real feedback
at that time on the relevance on working again on EPP or even, as
stated in my presentation, to try at least to make people (from
registries, registrars, and outside developers such as myself) to
collaborate together, starting with extensions documentation and
public announcements.

Hope that helps.

-- 
Patrick Mevzek
Dot and Co <http://www.dotandco.com/> <http://www.dotandco.net/>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
List run by majordomo software.  For (Un-)subscription and similar details
send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
List run by majordomo software.  For (Un-)subscription and similar details
send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se


Home | Date list | Subject list