To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
Date:
Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:51:27 -0400
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<20071031143731.GB24117@nic.fr>
Mail-Followup-To:
Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>,ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Reply-To:
Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] Re: EPP over HTTP or simple TCP?
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > I would be interested to know how many registrars send invalid > EPP. I'll bet if you speculate, you'll be close ;-) The problem with validating in real time is that people want the transactions to be very low-latency, and therefore the server has to minimise the resources it is willing to expend. IMO, though, validation would be a good thing. A -- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@ca.afilias.info> M2P 2A8 jabber: ajsaf@jabber.org +1 416 646 3304 x4110