[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:52:22 +0200
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070406122849.GA8337@afilias.info>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Subject: [ietf-provreg] Re: EPP Extensions for IDN 

On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:28:49AM -0400,
 Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info> wrote 
 a message of 18 lines which said:

> > See also section 5, "Internationalization Considerations". I would
> > say that an EPP server which does *not* accept espaņol is *not* a
> > compliant EPP server.

[My sentence was ambigous. I restate it: "An EPP server which does
*not* accept on-the-wire espaņol but accepts on-the-wire espa&#241;ol
is *not* a compliant EPP server."]

> Well, maybe not.  The server could respond with a policy error, for
> instance (on the grounds that only ASCII labels are what one wants
> to allow in the DNS).

In that case, it <rfc num="2119">MUST</rfc> rejects espa&#241;ol as
well.
Home | Date list | Subject list