To: Francisco Obispo <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <email@example.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 10:51:29 +0200
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Subject: [ietf-provreg] Re: EPP Extensions for IDN
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:14:39AM -0400, Francisco Obispo <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote a message of 75 lines which said: > We just encoded the domain name at the client into XML compatible > form (i.e: espaņol.com.ve -> español.com.ve), That's a strange sentence. EPP is based on XML and, for an application which uses a XML parser, espaņol is exactly the same as español (most XML parsers do not even inform the application what was the original form). To quote some relevant parts of RFC 3730 : All XML instances SHOULD begin with an <?xml?> declaration to identify the version of XML that is being used, optionally identify use of the character encoding used, and optionally provide a hint to an XML parser that an external schema file is needed to validate the XML instance. Conformant XML parsers recognize both UTF-8 (defined in RFC 2279 [RFC2279]) and UTF-16 (defined in RFC 2781 [RFC2781]); per RFC 2277 [RFC2277] UTF-8 is the RECOMMENDED character encoding for use with EPP. See also section 5, "Internationalization Considerations". I would say that an EPP server which does *not* accept espaņol is *not* a compliant EPP server.