To:
"Michael Young" <myoung@ca.afilias.info>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:24:23 -0400
Content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
AcW4Y31t0I+QU4ucSYusdbz736SdXAAANtsgAABoT5A=
Thread-Topic:
[ietf-provreg] EPP to Draft: Next Steps
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] EPP to Draft: Next Steps
> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Young [mailto:myoung@ca.afilias.info] > Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:19 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott; ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Subject: RE: [ietf-provreg] EPP to Draft: Next Steps > > I think the second option would be desirable Scott, but just > to clarify what > you had in mind,....I assume you mean a testbed that > demonstrates compliance > with the core RFC's and not, for example, 3915. Correct. 3915 and other extension documents like 4114 have to go through the same process to advance, but those documents have normative dependencies on the "core" object mappings. We have to do these first. > We could hold a meeting at the next IETF meeting to organize > how we would do > this with interested participants. We could. It might also be worth talking about at a CENTR or ICANN meeting if other implementers can be found there. -Scott-