RE: [ietf-provreg] EPP to Draft: Next Steps

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se 
> [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se] On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 8:50 AM
> To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] EPP to Draft: Next Steps
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Sorry not to have responded earlier.
> 
> Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com> 2005-09-13 19:02
> > 1. I need to make a minor edit to the contact (3733bis) and host
> > (3732bis) documents to fix one last <poll> use description. 
>  I described
> > that fix here [1].  I also need to add a sentence to 
> 3730bis (EPP core)
> > to note that it obsoletes 3730.  The references in 3731bis 
> (domain) will
> > need to be updated if 3732bis and 3733bis change.  These 
> are the last
> > needed document changes I'm aware of.
> 
> I think it would be good if these new versions got a 1.1 value in the
> <version> tag during server greeting as opposed to 1.0 for the
> current RFCs.
> 
> There are minor incompatibilites between the two (among which how to
> fill <domain:update> in case of an extension), so it seems worthwile
> to me to be able to clearly separates between the two, as some
> servers will implement one version, and some will implement the
> other.

Given that the schemas have not changed, and the version numbers
identify the namespaces and schemas, I don't see the need to increment
the version numbers.  Anything that was working a certain way before
should continue to work the same way with the proposed text changes.

-Scott-