RE: [ietf-provreg] the privacy problem statement

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

> > If I remember correctly the feeling of the room in San 
> Francisco was that
> > this could be limited to the contact mapping.
> 
> No. I'm less sure we agreed on that. The words I kept hearing 
> were 'social
> data' but It wasn't explicit that was limited to contact mapping.
> 
> It might be my misunderstanding of what 'social data' and 
> 'contact mapping'
> are in this context.

Absent anything that resembles social data (as described in RFC 3375)
outside the contact mapping, I'm working with a definition of social data
that only applies to elements present in the contact mapping.

-Scott-