[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "Edmon Chung" <edmon@neteka.com>, "Jaap Akkerhuis" <jaap@sidn.nl>
Cc: "Asbjorn Mikkelsen" <asteira@gnr.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: "Ram Mohan" <rmohan@afilias.info>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:20:16 -0500
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: side bar, was Re: [ietf-provreg] Our "Privacy Issue"

agreed, under IETF "Correct " rules.

reality is that EPP has taken off and no-one is waiting for the RFC to
implement - we have much more than just prototypes :)

-ram
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jaap Akkerhuis" <jaap@sidn.nl>
To: "Edmon Chung" <edmon@neteka.com>
Cc: "Asbjorn Mikkelsen" <asteira@gnr.com>; "Ram Mohan"
<rmohan@afilias.info>; <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 5:42 AM
Subject: Re: side bar, was Re: [ietf-provreg] Our "Privacy Issue"


>
>     > On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 03:10, Ram Mohan wrote:
>     > > Last time I checked, at least half a dozen registries are running
EPP
>     > > operationally.  .INFO (02); .ORG(07), .BIZ(04), .US(04?), .AU(05),
>     > > .NL(?)plus a bunch more ccTLDs.
>     >
>     > ...and .NAME(05)...
>     >
>     ...and .SG(04) and soon to be .BZ(04 or 07)
>
> To be (IETF) polical correct, the last time I checked, there was no
> EPP at all. Note that the IETF discourages the use of dratfs in any
> form. See attached scitation from RFC 2026. So, at best one can
> talk about "by the IETF provreg-WG insprired" protocol.
>
> And for good order, .NL is not using anything which remotely
> looks like EPP.
>
> jaap
>
> RFC 2026, section 2.6
>
>    An Internet-Draft is NOT a means of "publishing" a specification;
>    specifications are published through the RFC mechanism described in
>    the previous section.  Internet-Drafts have no formal status, and are
>    subject to change or removal at any time.
>
>       ********************************************************
>       *                                                      *
>       *   Under no circumstances should an Internet-Draft    *
>       *   be referenced by any paper, report, or Request-    *
>       *   for-Proposal, nor should a vendor claim compliance *
>       *   with an Internet-Draft.                            *
>       *                                                      *
>       ********************************************************
>


Home | Date list | Subject list