[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc: "'George Michaelson'" <ggm@apnic.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:20:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: <3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD6033708CE@vsvapostal3.prod.netsol.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: [ietf-provreg] the privacy problem statement

At 7:38 -0500 4/1/03, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>Absent anything that resembles social data (as described in RFC 3375)
>outside the contact mapping, I'm working with a definition of social data
>that only applies to elements present in the contact mapping.

In the IESG comment, "why do domain/contact/.. not have granular 
information about privacy?" domains are mentioned too.

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                            +1-703-227-9854
ARIN Research Engineer

I've had it with world domination.  The maintenance fees are too high.

Home | Date list | Subject list