To:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
CC:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'George Michaelson'" <ggm@apnic.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
janusz sienkiewicz <janusz@libertyrms.info>
Date:
Wed, 02 Apr 2003 11:43:56 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] the privacy problem statement
Edward Lewis wrote: > At 7:38 -0500 4/1/03, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > >Absent anything that resembles social data (as described in RFC 3375) > >outside the contact mapping, I'm working with a definition of social data > >that only applies to elements present in the contact mapping. > > In the IESG comment, "why do domain/contact/.. not have granular > information about privacy?" domains are mentioned too. > Domains don't have any social data (<domain:registrant>, <domain:contact> are just references to social data owned and maintained by registrars). That's why domains should not be within the scope of any privacy mechanism. > > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Edward Lewis +1-703-227-9854 > ARIN Research Engineer > > I've had it with world domination. The maintenance fees are too high. Janusz Sienkiewicz