Re: privacy

[Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>]

Although your message might sound derogatory (referring to "quite 
laughable") I think your sentiment is accurate and understood.  I 
think the enormity of the issue is why the group has yet to be able 
to form a consensus.  That point has been made.

During the Atlanta meeting we did talk about P3P and it's 
applicability to us.  (It's mentioned in the meeting minutes.  (See 
action item #3 and a discussion later in the minutes, oh, BTW - 
Rick?;) )

At 17:50 +0100 1/8/03, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 08:29:29AM -0800,
>  Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com> wrote
>  a message of 32 lines which said:
>
>>  IMHO, privacy needs to be addressed in a superset of the protocols (epp,
>>  crisp, whois) and a specific group tasked with that job;
>
>This is very reasonable (sorry for the fine members of the Provreg
>group but last-minute attempts to solve a problem as large as the
>privacy policies in a few lines of patch to the I-D are quite
>laughable).
>
>But such a group already exists: W3C's P3P group. P3P can be used for
>more than Web sites and they are willing to do what it needs to extend
>their framework to registry privacy policies.

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                          +1-703-227-9854
ARIN Research Engineer