[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, iesg@ietf.org
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:50:17 +0100
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0301080820230.26631-100000@flash.ar.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Subject: Re: privacy

On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 08:29:29AM -0800,
 Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com> wrote 
 a message of 32 lines which said:

> IMHO, privacy needs to be addressed in a superset of the protocols (epp,
> crisp, whois) and a specific group tasked with that job; 

This is very reasonable (sorry for the fine members of the Provreg
group but last-minute attempts to solve a problem as large as the
privacy policies in a few lines of patch to the I-D are quite
laughable).

But such a group already exists: W3C's P3P group. P3P can be used for
more than Web sites and they are willing to do what it needs to extend
their framework to registry privacy policies.


Home | Date list | Subject list