To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
CC:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
Date:
Mon, 09 Dec 2002 17:12:14 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD6033703A0@vsvapostal3.prod.netsol.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021205
Subject:
Re: lastVerified: optional vs. extension
Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> That message doesn't mention the bulk update issue at all, though
> in the thread that follows other folks note some issues with how the model
> makes it difficult to maintain consistent data views across all involved
> parties.
If anyone who has understood this model is unable to imagine how consistency is
maintained should feel free to contact me off the list. As I said earlier, I
don't think it make sense to discuss this any further here on the list.
> I think Jordyn summed up the situation quite nicely with the last
> sentence of this message:
>
> http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2001-08/msg00119.html
>
> "There are reasonable arguments on both sides of this debate, and no
> fool-proof solution has been presented that solves all of the issues
> raised."
Yes, let us close with this beautiful sentence having this nearly non-sensible
whiff of "get lost, we've already made our decisions", which I complied with then.
>
> I'm done.
>
> -Scott-
So am I.
regards,
Klaus
___________________________________________________________________________
| |
| knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
------- Technologiepark
Martin-Schmeißer-Weg 9
Dipl. Inf. Klaus Malorny 44227 Dortmund
Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de Tel. +49 231 9703 0