To:
Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
CC:
Hong Liu <lhongsms@yahoo.com>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, Ram Mohan <rmohan@afilias.info>
From:
janusz sienkiewicz <janusz@libertyrms.info>
Date:
Mon, 09 Dec 2002 11:22:44 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: lastVerified: optional vs. extension
Significant changes in this case mean pieces of text that explain how relevant epp commands and responses should handle lvDate element. Regards, Janusz Sienkiewicz Rick Wesson wrote: > On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, janusz sienkiewicz wrote: > > > I agree with Hong. > > >From XML schema point of view, adding lvDate element looks like a simple > > change (as complex as the fax element). From the implementation point of > > view it is not that simple. Significant changes may be required to EPP > > object mapping documents. > > could you list the "significant changes" that may be required to EPP? as > the statement above is tratitionally called hand-waving, you'll need to > back yous statement up with some examples. > > -rick