To:
Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc:
"'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, <jaap@sidn.nl>
From:
Richard Shockey <rich.shockey@neustar.com>
Date:
Mon, 02 Dec 2002 16:35:59 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.4.33.0212020926120.995-100000@flash.ar.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: milestones, was Re: a week later...
At 09:32 AM 12/2/2002 -0800, Rick Wesson wrote: > > > > Given that SOAP is still evolving, putting this on the experimental track > > might make sense if there's really sufficient implementation interest. I certainly would have no objection to experimental track.. I just hope folks will understand that over time the uses for this protocol may expand ..and as such people MAY wish to use transport layers that have a wider base of support and tool kits available. Over time I think folks will see the value of this work .. >I'd go one step further... an individual submission is ok too. > >I wouldn't be sad to see this group go into hybernation or declare success >and close. I hope the mailing list would continue but let the IETF work >finish. > >I will implement a EPP over SOAP+HTTPS should someone draft something >up. I'm all for interopability but if there is just two folks looking at >running this stuff I don't see the need to task the wg with the burdon of >a standards track document. > >let the SOAP draft be an individual submission of an experemental >protocol. > >best, > > >-rick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives NeuStar Inc. 46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166 Voice +1 571.434.5651 Cell : +1 314.503.0640, Fax: +1 815.333.1237 <mailto:richard@shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey@neustar.biz> <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<