To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "'Bruce Tonkin'" <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>, email@example.com
From: Edward Lewis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:25:46 -0500
Subject: RE: MX records in epp
If this matures and folks involved are so motivated, I'd like to see this come back to the list at some point. I'd like to see if this fits under the "E" in the protocol. Not that I'm promising that this would be within charter not am I inviting a WG document, but this may be an idea to explore. At 7:16 AM -0500 1/17/02, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: >As Dave Crocker noted, the general provisioning case for MX records is >within leaf-node zones. If there are exceptions, like in .com.au, I'd >suggest defining a protocol extension to the domain mapping to describe MX >record provisioning. Let's take it off-list if you'd like to explore that >option. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NAI Labs Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: email@example.com Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.