To:
"'Bruce Tonkin'" <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>
Cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 07:16:45 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: MX records in epp
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Tonkin [mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:02 PM > To: 'Hollenbeck, Scott' > Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Subject: MX records in epp > > > Hello Scott, > > In the ".com.au" zone file we have MX records for some > domains instead of NS > records. > > e.g domainname.com.au IN MX 10 mailserver.com.au > > How do you think this should be accommodated within EPP.? > > The domain name mapping object currently has: > <domain:ns> > <domain:host> > > Do we need a: > <domain:mx>? As Dave Crocker noted, the general provisioning case for MX records is within leaf-node zones. If there are exceptions, like in .com.au, I'd suggest defining a protocol extension to the domain mapping to describe MX record provisioning. Let's take it off-list if you'd like to explore that option. -Scott-