[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Patrick <patrick@gandi.net>
cc: "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@stealthgeeks.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20010829142152.M3901@nohope.patoche.org>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Message Pushing and TCP Transport

On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Patrick wrote:

> I am interested to have explanations by people wanting the PUSH.
> As far as I see in draft-brunner-xrp-01.txt (but maybe I'm not
> looking in the right place, if this is the case, do not hesitate to
> forward me) there is no technical explanations on how the push should
> work.
>
> It raises me questions like :
> - when a Registrar is connected multiple times, on what connection
> the Registry will push ?
> - will the Registry wait for an ACK after the push ? what will be
> done if it is not received ? will the messages be pushed later ?
> how many times ? dropped ? when ? how ?

Personally, I see a lot of parallels between this and the exchange of
email which is a relatively well-understood problem set(connections,
queuing, etc.)

As the number of registries and registrars scale, it might be much more
appropriate to have those registries PUSHing messages only to those
that have messages in the queue rather than having the registrars blindly
polling each registry on a timed interval.

As such, I definitely think PUSH should be present as an option.

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
                               Patrick Greenwell
                       Earth is a single point of failure.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/


Home | Date list | Subject list