To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
cc:
"'Klaus Malorny'" <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date:
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
<DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D01878074@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Poll response data
Scott, On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > After thinking about this for a bit, I like Klaus' idea of returning more > transfer detail in the <poll> response. Doing so will help reduce the need > to do an immediate <transfer> query right after receiving a message to > obtain the details of a pending transfer. > however the tradeoff is that the queue(s) wiill have to be larger and couldn't the information become out of sync with the rest of the registry? Registrar-A submits a transfer request for foo.com from Registrar-B <registry inserts stuff in queue> Registrar-B does poll and ACK on foo.com Registrar-A does a poll -> is the information correct? A better question is this situation ok? -rick