To:
"'Klaus Malorny'" <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
Cc:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:27:14 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Poll response data
>-----Original Message----- >From: Klaus Malorny [mailto:Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de] >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:14 AM >To: Hollenbeck, Scott >Cc: 'ietf-provreg@cafax.se' >Subject: Re: Poll response data [snip] >you are right, but this was just a suggestion (I want to make constructive >comments ;-). I don't mind if you reduce the content to the absolute minimum. >It would of course be enough if it would be like the result of the poll >request in the example on page 24 of draft-ietf-provreg-epp-03. But please add >this as a requirement. To me it's a kind of horror vision to see transfer >notifications transmitted outside of the protocol (worst is per e-mail), >albeit the EPP already contains the whole functionality for it. Making it to a >requirement will ensure that EPP is used for this purpose. After thinking about this for a bit, I like Klaus' idea of returning more transfer detail in the <poll> response. Doing so will help reduce the need to do an immediate <transfer> query right after receiving a message to obtain the details of a pending transfer. <Scott/>