Document Last Call Summary: Unresolved Items

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

On 3 April 2001, Ed Lewis issued a WG last call on this document:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-provreg-grrp-reqs-01.txt

Here's a pointer to the announcement:

http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2001-04/msg00004.html

What follows is a high-level summary of discussion during the last call
period for which there was disagreement among list members.  Additional
discussion, or chair action to determine rough consensus, is required before
document impact can be assessed.

1. Issues on 3.4.9 Object Information Query
http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2001-04/msg00053.html

There was a discussion of adding a requirement for a query to report more
abstract object relationships, but differing opinions on the appropriateness
of adding such a requirement.  This relates to issues also described in #2
and #3 below.  A compromise proposal to document the existence of
relationships was offered since there doesn't seem to be a consensus
position on the changes suggested in the original comment. 

2. comments on last draft
http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2001-04/msg00085.html

There was a discussion touching on multiple topics; the final open points
appear to relate to the abstract object relationship query questions first
raised in #1 (see above) and the appropriateness of adding a requirement
relating to back-end registry validation procedures.

3. 3.4/Object Ownership, esp. Name Server Ownership
http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2001-04/msg00091.html

There was a discussion relating to name server management and operational
issues with the restrictive management model described in the draft.  Issues
with the restrictive model and a more open model relating to #1 above were
described, and discussion did not produce a clear preference.

<Scott/>