[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Mats Dufberg <dufberg@nic-se.se>, "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@register.com>
cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 22:20:59 +0200
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0104062156300.27452-100000@spider.nic-se.se>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Nameserver MUST HAVE IP

--On 01-04-06 22.02 +0200 Mats Dufberg <dufberg@nic-se.se> wrote:

> If then ns3.foo.com and ns1.foo.se are the namesevers of bar.com, neither
> of the IP addresses are needed (the IP address of ns1.foo.se is forbidden
> in com zone). The IP address of ns3.foo.com is to be found in the foo.com
> zone through normal lookup.

But, what about these two zones:

$ORIGIN foo.com.
foo.com. IN NS ns.bar.se.

$ORIGIN bar.se.
bar.se. IN NS ns.foo.com.

  ;-)

I have never seen this in real life, but it is possible at least 
theoretically...

I really would like to know about a real example, if anyone have one.

   paf


Home | Date list | Subject list