To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Date:
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:10:36 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<a05100911b6f3bed557e2@[10.10.20.173]>; from Jordyn A. Buchanan on Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 02:45:49PM -0400
Mail-Followup-To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Nameserver MUST HAVE IP
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 02:45:49PM -0400, Jordyn A. Buchanan wrote: > ...and this complies completely with the existing requirement. > > But I'll stop trying to argue this point. If people want to do allow > names in their registry to become unresolvable, I guess it's none of > my business. The requirement does not prevent names from becoming unresolvable -- there are lots of other ways that can happen, and arguably, the increased churn in the address data leads to more misconfigurations than it prevents. It's hard to say. -- Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain