To:
"Christopher Ambler" <cambler-ietf@iodesign.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@register.com>
Date:
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 14:45:49 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<04c801c0bec6$f9dd5d10$1701a8c0@underslunky>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Nameserver MUST HAVE IP
At 11:25 AM -0700 4/6/01, Christopher Ambler wrote: > > I never understand the sense of the NSI requirements and the need for host >> handles. In Germany, we have more then 4,000,000 DE-domains, we only >> require the IP of the DNS, if the DNS is in the domain (eg. DNS >> "ns3.knipp.de" is responsible for the domain "knipp.de"). > >We take it a bit further for .Web, and require them when the name servers >are in any other .Web domain, since we'd rather be careful and avoid loops. >Sure, it could be resolved at build time, but we're lazy :-) > ...and this complies completely with the existing requirement. But I'll stop trying to argue this point. If people want to do allow names in their registry to become unresolvable, I guess it's none of my business. Jordyn -- Jordyn A. Buchanan jordyn@register.com Futurist +1.212.798.9262 Register.com http://www.register.com/