To:
Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Cc:
"Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@walid.com>, Patrik Faltstrom <paf@cisco.com>, Hollenbeck Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
George Belotsky <george@register.com>
Date:
Thu, 8 Mar 2001 14:44:33 -0500
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<200103081900.f28J0DN02549@zed.isi.edu>; from bmanning@ISI.EDU on Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:00:13AM -0800
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.2.5i
Subject:
Re: Unique handle generation
With something like 'WM-9387-19790922:09:27:33' we are back to handles that are hard to remember. In previous posts, complaints were raised about this issue. If readability is not a problem, existing UUID algorithms will ensure uniqueness. From previous discussion, I have identified three properties of handles that people seemed to find desireable (listed again below). (i) Handles should be easy to remember/readable; (ii) Handles should identify objects uniquely; (iii) It's probably a bad idea for the handles to change. Does everyone agree with the above list? George. On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:00:13AM -0800, Bill Manning wrote: > % > % > I like the idea of a timestamp, but I don't want to remember it > % > as part of my handle. > % > % Hi. I'm "Brian W. Spolarich-RIPE-984076683". > % > % Ick. :-) > % > % -bws > > > Well... the American Registry for Internet Numbers got ARIN. > Does that mean the Argentian Registry for Internet Numbers gets ARIN2 ? > > Under the new RIR structure, I am assigned WM110-<rir-handle> > Under the old, single IR structure, I was assigned WM110. > Under the earlier IR structure, I was assigned WMAN > > A couple of problems. > There is a problem with internal vs external tagging. e.g. > the registrar should not expose their internal tagging of client > handles. > Then there is the debate on dealing w/ duplicates. The approch > currently in use is to assign a monotonically increasing number > to initals. Patrik has refined this to using a timestamp. > (warning... curveball ahead...:) > And then there is the use of initals. Not everyone uses ASCII. > How will "handles" support non-ASCII character representations? > > Endgame... I think I should be able to select the "seed" be which > my Internet-wide, unique handle is created. My seed is used to > generate a unique handle that has at least two other, non-Internet > related "salts". So my handle might be: > > WM-9387-19790922:09:27:33 > > My initals, the last four characters of my national > registration card, and the date/time stamp I first logged ito > an IP-supporting node. > > ARINs could be: > > ARIN-8866-19970110 > > Their initals, the last four characters of their TaxID, > and the date of first operation. > > YMMV... > > > -- > --bill -- ----------------------------- George Belotsky Senior Software Architect Register.com, inc. george@register.com 212-798-9127 (phone) 212-798-9876 (fax)