To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Date:
Sun, 4 Feb 2001 07:34:32 -0800
In-Reply-To:
<021d01c08ebe$6841b140$aa2bd63f@jamessonyvaio>; from James Seng/Personal on Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 11:23:19PM +0800
Mail-Followup-To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Interim Meeting
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 11:23:19PM +0800, James Seng/Personal wrote: [...] > Your reqs spec has been published as an individual I-D, largely ignored > by the other community because they see it as primarly NSI focus with > your registrars. I know you it wasnt meant to be but that is the > perspective share by others. That is probably true. > Now, if it is a WG I-D, i think we need to go out and correct the > perspection that it is not just an NSI I-D. It is beyond that and it is > going to come back haunt them if they dont take note now. > > Your I-D will make great input to this going-to-be WG. But as an WG I-D, > I think it is safe to safe to say that we need more reviews beyond your > registrars. I am sure the other registries have their comments too so > why not hear them out? Scott said: "If anyone has issues with it I wish they would make them known..." What, specifically, are your issues with it? -- Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain