To:
George Belotsky <george@register.com>
cc:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se, ietf-whois@imc.org, brunner@nic-naa.net
From:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date:
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:30:28 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Your message of "Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:18:55 EST." <20010123131855.E24903@register.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Merging RRP and Whois
George, Wearing my rrp-implementor hat, I'm implementing bulk transport of user profiles[1], including a mechanism to support registry, registrar, and also promoted registrant "hints" for policed access mechanisms. I've got all the reliable, non-repudiation, secure hurdles to clear as well. Bulk is zero-or-more user profiles, aka "registrar-provided registrant data". One "hint" I think is required is the controlling jurisdiction(s) for any specific datum, registrant originated, registrar originated, or registry originated. My idea of "extensible" is that the rrp _might_ be useful to the ccTLD actors, or any other form of Registry-Registrar model ICANN posits in the near future, as my rrp-implementor hat reads "gTLD(s) first". Wearing my who-wannabe-implementor hat, I'm implementing non-bulk-query of user profiles, and transporting data with hints intact for use at some unspecified point where policy (or hints) are evaluated, isn't part of the less-than-pelucid-spec. In fact, what spec? For all I know, the lookup could point to registries having little or nothing to do with DNS registry data, e.g., Acxiom. Finding a schema, or bits of several, that can be recycled, isn't very hard, but is it interesting? I don't think the rest of the problem is as amenable to reuse or recycling or a unifying software architectural model as the schema question. Cheers, Eric --- [1] see also www.cpexchange.org, which has a bulk user profile exchange protocol with similar properties, created by the on-line marketers and ultra-large vertically integrated vendors.