[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: George Belotsky <george@register.com>
Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: Olivier Guillard / AFNIC <guillard@nic.fr>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 19:13:14 +0100
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010122141511.C24633@register.com>; from george@register.com on Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 02:15:11PM -0500
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Subject: Re: Merging RRP and Whois


Hi,

DNS is designed to reference an information
Whois is designed to provide an information

It is not a good idea to think about unifying
two inconsistent issues.

Regards,

Olivier

le 22 Jan, George Belotsky a écrit :
> Hello, All.
>  
> I have recently posted the information below to the Whois list.
>  
> The RRP group has made quite a bit of progress on a generic
> protocol for Registry-Registrar communication.
>  
> It would save a lot of duplicated effort if the Whois and RRP
> protocols could be merged into a single standard.  Registries,
> Registrars, and end users would then have to contend with a single   
> protocol, instead of two diverging ones.
>  
> At the most fundamental level, both Whois and RRP provide a view into
> the the repository of information associated with a domain name.  A
> sufficiently rich protocol would allow for these views to be finely
> adjusted.  In addition, it would be possible for other views to
> emerge, as necessity dictates.
>  
> Implementation effort, number of bugs, testing and troubleshooting
> should all be positively affected by having only a single protocol to
> deal with.  This would surely benefit everyone.
>  
> George.
>  
> 
> -----------------------------
> George Belotsky
> Senior Software Architect
> Register.com, inc.
> george@register.com
> 212-798-9127 (phone)
> 212-798-9876 (fax)

-- 
Olivier Guillard
---
||    A.F.N.I.C.
|| http://www.nic.fr

Home | Date list | Subject list